Oct 9th, 2008| 04:28 pm | Posted by hlee
Without signal processing courses, the following equation should be awfully familiar to astronomers of photometry and handling data:

Terms are in order, camera response (c_k), light source (l), spectral radiance by l (r), filter (f), sensitivity (α), and noise (n_k), where Λ indicates the range of the spectrum in which the camera is sensitive.
Or simplified to 
where φ denotes the combined illuminant and the spectral sensitivity of the k-th channel, which goes by augmented spectral sensitivity. Well, we can skip spectral radiance r, though. Unfortunately, the sensitivity α has multiple layers, not a simple closed function of λ in astronomical photometry.
Or 
Inverting Θ and finding a reconstruction operator such that r=inv(Θ)c_k leads spectral reconstruction although Θ is, in general, not a square matrix. Otherwise, approach from indirect reconstruction. Continue reading ‘[tutorial] multispectral imaging, a case study’ »
Tags:
matrix,
Mona Lisa,
multispectral,
noise,
signal processing,
signal processing magazine,
Tutorial Category:
Algorithms,
Cross-Cultural,
Data Processing,
Fitting,
Imaging,
Methods,
Quotes,
Spectral,
Stat,
Uncertainty,
arXiv |
2 Comments
Sep 10th, 2008| 10:15 am | Posted by hlee
Physicists believe that the Gaussian law has been proved in mathematics while mathematicians think that it was experimentally established in physics — Henri Poincare
Continue reading ‘Why Gaussianity?’ »
Tags:
CLT,
Gaussianity,
Henry Poincare,
IEEE,
normal,
signal processing,
signal processing magazine,
Why Category:
Cross-Cultural,
Data Processing,
Fitting,
Frequentist,
Methods,
Physics,
Quotes,
Stat,
Uncertainty,
arXiv |
Comment
Mar 14th, 2008| 03:44 pm | Posted by hlee
Warning! The list is long this week but diverse. Some are of CHASC’s obvious interest. Continue reading ‘[ArXiv] 2nd week, Mar. 2008’ »
Tags:
ANN,
autocorrelation,
Classification,
cross-correlation,
Estimation,
Fisher information,
lensing,
LF,
Model Selection,
Pareto,
signal processing,
tessellation Category:
MCMC,
arXiv |
Comment
Jan 30th, 2008| 02:33 am | Posted by hlee
Astronomers have developed their ways of processing signals almost independent to but sometimes collaboratively with engineers, although the fundamental of signal processing is same: extracting information. Doubtlessly, these two parallel roads of astronomers’ and engineers’ have been pointing opposite directions: one toward the sky and the other to the earth. Nevertheless, without an intensive argument, we could say that somewhat statistics has played the medium of signal processing for both scientists and engineers. This particular issue of IEEE signal processing magazine may shed lights for astronomers interested in signal processing and statistics outside the astronomical society.
IEEE Signal Processing Magazine Jul. 2007 Vol 24 Issue 4: Bootstrap methods in signal processing
This link will show the table of contents and provide links to articles; however, the access to papers requires IEEE Xplore subscription via libraries or individual IEEE memberships). Here, I’d like to attempt to introduce some articles and tutorials.
Continue reading ‘Signal Processing and Bootstrap’ »
Tags:
bootstrap,
compressive sensing,
confidence interval,
GLM,
IEEE,
jacknife,
machine learning,
multitaper estimate,
particle filter,
signal processing,
statistical inference,
Tutorial,
wavelet Category:
Algorithms,
Bayesian,
Cross-Cultural,
Fitting,
Frequentist,
MC,
MCMC,
Methods,
Misc,
Spectral,
Stat,
Uncertainty,
arXiv |
Comment