<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The AstroStat Slog &#187; colour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/tag/colour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog</link>
	<description>Weaving together Astronomy+Statistics+Computer Science+Engineering+Intrumentation, far beyond the growing borders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Magnitude [Eqn]</title>
		<link>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2008/eotw-magnitude/</link>
		<comments>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2008/eotw-magnitude/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jargon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[color]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EotW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equation of the Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnitude]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still remember my first class as a new grad student.  As a cocky Physics graduate, I was quite sure I knew plenty of astronomy.  Astro 301, class 1, and it took all of 20 minutes of talk about stellar magnitudes to put that notion to permanent rest.  So, for the sake [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still remember my first class as a new grad student.  As a cocky Physics graduate, I was quite sure I knew plenty of astronomy.  Astro 301, class 1, and it took all of 20 minutes of talk about stellar magnitudes to put that notion to permanent rest.  So, for the sake of our stats colleagues, here&#8217;s a brief primer on one of the basic building blocks of astronomy. <span id="more-447"></span></p>
<p>For historical reasons, astronomers measure the brightness of celestial objects in rank order.  The smaller the rank number, aka magnitude, the brighter the object.  Thus, a star of the first magnitude is much brighter than a star of the sixth magnitude, and it would take exceptionally good eyes and a very dark sky to see a star of the seventh magnitude.   Now, it turns out that the human eye perceives brightness on a log scale, so magnitudes are numerically similar to <em>log</em>(brightness).  And because they are a ranking list, it is always with reference to a standard.  After some rough calibration to match human perception to true brightness of stars in the night sky, we have a formal definition for magnitude,<br />
$$m = &#8211; \frac{5}{2}\log_{10}\left(\frac{f_{object}}{f_{standard}}\right) \,,$$<br />
where <em>f<sub>object</sub></em> is the flux from the object and <em>f<sub>standard</sub></em> is the flux from a fiducial standard.  In the optical bands, the bright star Vega (&#945; Lyrae) has been adopted as the standard, and has magnitudes of 0 in all optical filters.  (Well, not exactly because Vega is not constant enough, and as a practical matter there is nowadays a hierarchy of photometric standard stars that are accessible at different parts of the sky.)  Note that we can also write this in terms of the intrinsic luminosity <em>L<sub>object</sub></em> of the object and the distance <em>d</em> to it,<br />
$$m = &#8211; \frac{5}{2}\log_{10}\left(\frac{L_{object}}{4 \pi d^2}\frac{1}{f_{standard}}\right) \,.$$</p>
<p>Because astronomical objects are located at a vast variety of distances, it is useful to define an intrinsic magnitude of the object, independent of the distance.  Thus, in contrast to the <em>apparent</em> magnitude <em>m</em>, which is the brightness at Earth, an <em>absolute</em> magnitude is defined as the brightness that would be perceived if the object were 10 parsecs away,<br />
$$M \equiv m|_{d={\rm 10~pc}} = m &#8211; \frac{5}{2}\log_{10}\left(\frac{d^2}{{\rm (10~pc)}^2}\right) \equiv m &#8211; 5\log_{10}d + 5$$<br />
where <em>d</em> is the distance to the object in <strong>[parsec]</strong>, and the squared term is of course because of the inverse square law.</p>
<p>There are other issues such as interstellar absorption, cosmological corrections, extent of the source, etc., but let&#8217;s not complicate it too much right away.</p>
<p>Colors are differences in the magnitudes in different passbands.  For instance, if the apparent magnitude in the blue filter is <em>m<sub>B</sub></em> and in the green filter is <em>m<sub>V</sub></em> (V for &#8220;visual&#8221;), the color is <em>m<sub>B</sub>-m<sub>V</sub></em> and is usually referred to as &#8220;B-V&#8221; color.  It is the difference in magnitudes, and is related to the log ratio of the intensities.</p>
<p>For an excellent description of what is involved in the <u>measurement</u> of magnitudes and colors, see <a href="http://www.starstryder.com/2007/10/16/making-photometric-data-fit-in-a-standard-system-using-excel/">this article on analyzing photometric data</a>  by <a href="http://www.starstryder.com/">Star Stryder</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2008/eotw-magnitude/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

