<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The AstroStat Slog &#187; Celestia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/tag/celestia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog</link>
	<description>Weaving together Astronomy+Statistics+Computer Science+Engineering+Intrumentation, far beyond the growing borders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Beyond Google Sky</title>
		<link>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/beyond-google-sky/</link>
		<comments>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/beyond-google-sky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 18:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celestia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Sky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stellarium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual observatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XEphem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/beyond-google-sky/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Sky is good for a quick look &#8220;what&#8217;s that you just saw over there?&#8221;, but not for anything more than that.  Not yet anyway.  Mind you, I think it is a good thing.  It is easy to use, and definitely worth a look as an astronomy popularization tool.  But there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/arxiv-google-sky-sept-05-2007/">Google Sky</a> is good for a quick look &#8220;what&#8217;s that you just saw over there?&#8221;, but not for anything more than that.  Not yet anyway.  Mind you, I think it is a good thing.  It is easy to use, and definitely worth a look as an astronomy popularization tool.  But there are a number of astro visualization programs that can (so to speak) beat the pants off Google Sky with one hand tied behind the back.  Check these out (all open source):<span id="more-139"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.clearskyinstitute.com/xephem/">XEphem</a> : http://www.clearskyinstitute.com/xephem/<br />
<a href="http://www.shatters.net/celestia/">Celestia</a> : http://www.shatters.net/celestia/<br />
<a href="http://www.stellarium.org/">Stellarium</a> : http://www.stellarium.org/</p>
<p>There are many more, of varying degrees of usefulness, user friendliness, and price.  Your mileage will vary.  But for sheer wow factor, hard to beat Celestia.</p>
<p><strong>[Update 10/01]:</strong> The <a href="http://andyxl.wordpress.com/">e-Astronomer</a> considers how Google Sky could <a href="http://andyxl.wordpress.com/2007/09/30/google-sky-gateway-drug/">become more useful</a>.  Some interesting tie-ins to Virtual Observatory concepts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/beyond-google-sky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

