<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poisson vs Gaussian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2009/poigauss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2009/poigauss/</link>
	<description>Weaving together Astronomy+Statistics+Computer Science+Engineering+Intrumentation, far beyond the growing borders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:44:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2009/poigauss/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/?p=2166#comment-873</guid>
		<description>I personally think that Python with numpy/scipy/matplotlib and the ipython frontend is the best lingua franca for such collaborations. If you&#039;re familar with Matlab and R, the transition is very easy. Also, you get real object orientation, a price tag of $0, a solid C API for numerically intensive work, and all of Python&#039;s libraries for load/cleaning/dealing with the raw data. And, with RPy, you can use R from Python.

Oh, and, on top of that, you get happy astronomers :) ; always a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think that Python with numpy/scipy/matplotlib and the ipython frontend is the best lingua franca for such collaborations. If you&#8217;re familar with Matlab and R, the transition is very easy. Also, you get real object orientation, a price tag of $0, a solid C API for numerically intensive work, and all of Python&#8217;s libraries for load/cleaning/dealing with the raw data. And, with RPy, you can use R from Python.</p>
<p>Oh, and, on top of that, you get happy astronomers <img src='http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ; always a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hlee</title>
		<link>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2009/poigauss/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>hlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/?p=2166#comment-872</guid>
		<description>Upon reading it, I recall my post and the article therein, covering the topic in general: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/interval-estimation-in-exponential-families/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Coverage issues in exponential families&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;. The authors, Brown, Cai,and DasGupta discussed biases.

Alot to be said related to binning, multinomial, approximation or converenge in order to use chi-square type test statistics and to compensate discreteness in Poisson; instead i&#039;d rather put an irrelevant question. &lt;u&gt;How many statisticians would know IDL?&lt;/u&gt; (I believe I&#039;m one of not many). For interdisciplinary collaborations, I think setting up a common language or two could accelerate the progress (a bad and living example is myself). Or setting a consistent fashion across communities of writing pseudo codes as a universal language that can be easily transcribed into your choice of language.

R is free and widely used among statisticians (believe it or not, statisticians also use various languages and softwares although astronomers may think we only use R) and I believe the counterpart in astronomy is python. Matlab can be a neutral choice since both communities are exposed to this language and very extensively used in computer science and engineering. Shall we talk about this?

&lt;b&gt;[Added]&lt;/b&gt; I wonder if there&#039;s a way, a plug-in maybe,  instead of html code, to insert a little survey and to produce subsequent statistics for a review within blog. Thanks~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon reading it, I recall my post and the article therein, covering the topic in general: <b><a href="http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/interval-estimation-in-exponential-families/" rel="nofollow">Coverage issues in exponential families</a></b>. The authors, Brown, Cai,and DasGupta discussed biases.</p>
<p>Alot to be said related to binning, multinomial, approximation or converenge in order to use chi-square type test statistics and to compensate discreteness in Poisson; instead i&#8217;d rather put an irrelevant question. <u>How many statisticians would know IDL?</u> (I believe I&#8217;m one of not many). For interdisciplinary collaborations, I think setting up a common language or two could accelerate the progress (a bad and living example is myself). Or setting a consistent fashion across communities of writing pseudo codes as a universal language that can be easily transcribed into your choice of language.</p>
<p>R is free and widely used among statisticians (believe it or not, statisticians also use various languages and softwares although astronomers may think we only use R) and I believe the counterpart in astronomy is python. Matlab can be a neutral choice since both communities are exposed to this language and very extensively used in computer science and engineering. Shall we talk about this?</p>
<p><b>[Added]</b> I wonder if there&#8217;s a way, a plug-in maybe,  instead of html code, to insert a little survey and to produce subsequent statistics for a review within blog. Thanks~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

