<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poisson Likelihood [Equation of the Week]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2008/eotw-poisson-likelihood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2008/eotw-poisson-likelihood/</link>
	<description>Weaving together Astronomy+Statistics+Computer Science+Engineering+Intrumentation, far beyond the growing borders</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: hlee</title>
		<link>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2008/eotw-poisson-likelihood/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>hlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/?p=333#comment-277</guid>
		<description>I think Poisson probability mass function is statistician's jargon matching your Poisson likelihood. A few times, I saw Poisson statistics from astro-ph preprints instead which I believe Poisson pmf. Thanks for the neat derivation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Poisson probability mass function is statistician&#8217;s jargon matching your Poisson likelihood. A few times, I saw Poisson statistics from astro-ph preprints instead which I believe Poisson pmf. Thanks for the neat derivation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
