keV vs keV [Eqn]

I have noticed that our statistician collaborators are often confused by our units. (Not a surprise; I, too, am constantly confused by our units.) One of the biggest culprits is the unit of energy, [keV], which is 1000 electron Volts, for the energy acquired by an electron when it falls through an electric potential of 1 Volt:

1 [eV] ≡ 1.6021892 · 10-19 [Joule] ≡ 1.6021892 · 10-12 [erg] .

The confusion is because the same units are used to denote two separate quantities which happen to have similar magnitudes for a commonly encountered spectral model, Bremsstrahlung emission.

  1. the frequency ν, or wavelength λ, of a photon: As Planck discovered, the energy of a photon is directly related to the frequency ν,

    E = h · ν ≡ h · c / λ ,

    where h=6.6261760 · 10-27 [erg s] is Planck’s constant and c=2.9979246 · 1010 [cm s-1] is the speed of light in vaccum. When λ is given in [Ångström] ≡ 10-8 [cm], we can convert it as

    [keV] = 12.398521 / [Å] ,

    which is an extraordinarily useful thing to know in high-energy astrophysics.

  2. the temperature T of a gas or plasma: Here we look to thermodynamics, which relates the kinetic energy of random motion of particles in a gas to a gross property, the temperature of the gas,

    E = kB · T ,

    where kB = 1.3806620 · 10-16 [erg K-1] is Boltzmann’s constant. Then, a temperature in degrees Kelvin can be written in units of keV by converting it with the formula

    [keV] = 8.6173468 · 10-8 · [K] ≡ 0.086173468 · [MK] .

It is tempting to put the two together and interpret a temperature as a photon energy. This is possible for the aforementioned Bremsstrahlung radiation, where plasma at a temperature T produces a spectrum of photons distributed as e-h ν / kB T and it is possible to tie the temperature to the photon energy at the point where the numerator and denominator have the same numerical value. For example, a 1 keV (temperature) Bremsstrahlung spectrum extends out to 1 keV (photon energy). X-ray Astronomers use this as shorthand all the time, and it confuses the hell out of everybody else.

One Comment
  1. Simon Vaughan:

    On this topic Richard Feynman is supposed to have said:

    “Before I begin the lecture, I wish to apologize for something that is not my responsibility: Physicists and scientists all over the world have been measuring things in different units, and causing an enormous amount of complexity. As a matter of fact, nearly a third of what you have to learn 1 consists of different ways of measuring the same thing, and I apologize for it…

    “The physicists do something else when they want to talk about the energy of a single atom, instead of the energy of a gross amount of material. The reason is, of course, that a single atom is such a small thing that to talk about its energy in joules would be inconvenient. But instead of taking a definite unit in the same system (like 10^-20 J), they have unfortunately chosen, arbitrarily, a funny unit called an electronvolt (eV), which is the energy needed to move an electron through a potential difference of one volt, and that turns out to be about 1.6 10^-19 J. I am sorry that we do that, but that’s the way it is for the physicists.”

    07-30-2008, 1:07 pm
Leave a comment

Be advised that your thoughtful comment may not be submitted if too much time is spent. For a long comment, use an editor and copy the content into the box below. If unexpected submission denial happens, go back, copy the content, refresh the browser, paste the content, and then submit.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>