<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GLAST Workshop on June 21 at Science Ctr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/glast-workshop-june-21-science-ctr-a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/glast-workshop-june-21-science-ctr-a/</link>
	<description>Weaving together Astronomy+Statistics+Computer Science+Engineering+Intrumentation, far beyond the growing borders</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hlee</title>
		<link>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/glast-workshop-june-21-science-ctr-a/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>hlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/glast-workshop-june-21-science-ctr-a/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I was going to add that. Too many subscripts and superscripts in addition to shorthands. Then, thought about tensors by astrophysicists (cosmologists). Later, I realized statisticians use "suppose," "consider" and "assume" too often times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to add that. Too many subscripts and superscripts in addition to shorthands. Then, thought about tensors by astrophysicists (cosmologists). Later, I realized statisticians use &#8220;suppose,&#8221; &#8220;consider&#8221; and &#8220;assume&#8221; too often times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vlk</title>
		<link>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/glast-workshop-june-21-science-ctr-a/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>vlk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/glast-workshop-june-21-science-ctr-a/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I can't speak for other astronomers, but I do think that statisticians use greek letters far too restrictively.  A strict system is all well and good, but one quickly runs out of symbols that way.  Which is why I suppose statisticians use so much shorthand, e.g., a Gaussian is N(0,1) rather than
g(x) = exp(-x^2/2)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t speak for other astronomers, but I do think that statisticians use greek letters far too restrictively.  A strict system is all well and good, but one quickly runs out of symbols that way.  Which is why I suppose statisticians use so much shorthand, e.g., a Gaussian is N(0,1) rather than<br />
g(x) = exp(-x^2/2)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hlee</title>
		<link>http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/glast-workshop-june-21-science-ctr-a/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>hlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/glast-workshop-june-21-science-ctr-a/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>I went the workshop thanks to my curiosity. One thing I noticed is that astronomers use lots of acronyms. I'm sure astronomers think statisticians use too many greet letters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went the workshop thanks to my curiosity. One thing I noticed is that astronomers use lots of acronyms. I&#8217;m sure astronomers think statisticians use too many greet letters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
