Comments on: [ArXiv] Correlation Studies, June 12, 2007 http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/arxiv-correlation-studies-june-12-2007/ Weaving together Astronomy+Statistics+Computer Science+Engineering+Intrumentation, far beyond the growing borders Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:44:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: hlee http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/arxiv-correlation-studies-june-12-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-120 hlee Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:32:16 +0000 http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/arxiv-correlation-studies-june-12-2007/#comment-120 After attending <a href="http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/clay-public-lecture-technology-driven-statistics/" rel="nofollow">Clay lecture</a> and talks at CfA, I got an impression that correlation studies from astronomy are confined to statistics of linear regression and, I believe, can be modified/improved depending on the types of correlation (e.g. the looks of scatter plots, covariates, and outliers). Compiling more data has been the target to illustrate better correlations (evidence of correlations) but exploring statistical methods to estimate correlations (even we can include the uncertain nature of measurements both on x and y axes and we can assume different distribution family beyond normal) could reveal different aspects of (physical) correlations. After attending Clay lecture and talks at CfA, I got an impression that correlation studies from astronomy are confined to statistics of linear regression and, I believe, can be modified/improved depending on the types of correlation (e.g. the looks of scatter plots, covariates, and outliers). Compiling more data has been the target to illustrate better correlations (evidence of correlations) but exploring statistical methods to estimate correlations (even we can include the uncertain nature of measurements both on x and y axes and we can assume different distribution family beyond normal) could reveal different aspects of (physical) correlations.

]]> By: vlk http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/arxiv-correlation-studies-june-12-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-31 vlk Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:37:54 +0000 http://groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/2007/arxiv-correlation-studies-june-12-2007/#comment-31 Re: "astronomers believe important physical correlation comes from a statistically significant correlation coefficient without investigating the foundation of statistical inference" I think you have this backwards. Important physical correlation is <strong>supported</strong> by statistically significant <strong>evidence</strong>. The mere existence of a correlation is not taken as evidence of causation. Re: “astronomers believe important physical correlation comes from a statistically significant correlation coefficient without investigating the foundation of statistical inference”

I think you have this backwards. Important physical correlation is supported by statistically significant evidence. The mere existence of a correlation is not taken as evidence of causation.

]]>