Jun 12th, 2009| 03:47 pm | Posted by hlee
A Fast Thresholded Landweber Algorithm for Wavelet-Regularized Multidimensional Deconvolution
Vonesch and Unser (2008)
IEEE Trans. Image Proc. vol. 17(4), pp. 539-549
Quoting the authors, I also like to say that the recovery of the original image from the observed is an ill-posed problem. They traced the efforts of wavelet regularization in deconvolution back to a few relatively recent publications by astronomers. Therefore, I guess the topic and algorithm of this paper could drag some attentions from astronomers. …Continue reading»
Tags:
bound optimization,
deconvolution,
image processing,
impulse response,
MM algorithm,
PSF,
regularization,
restoration,
thresholding,
wavelet Category:
Algorithms,
Data Processing,
Fitting,
Imaging,
Jargon,
Methods,
Quotes,
Stat,
arXiv |
Comment
Jun 11th, 2009| 03:52 pm | Posted by hlee
I was at the SUSY 09 public lecture given by a Nobel laureate, Frank Wilczek of QCD (quantum chromodynamics). As far as I know SUSY is the abbreviation of SUperSYmetricity in particle physics. Finding such antimatter(? I’m afraid I read “Angels and Demons” too quickly) will explain the unification theory among electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces and even the gravitation according to the speaker’s graph. I’ll not go into the details of particle physics and the standard model. The reason is too obvious.
Instead, I’d like to show this image from wikipedia and to discuss my related questions.
…Continue reading»
Tags:
cliche,
collion,
identifiability,
identification,
irony,
LHC,
Power,
reconstruction,
source detection,
subparticle,
supersymmetry,
SUSY,
TRACE,
type I error,
Type II error,
uncertainty principle,
unification,
youtube Category:
Cross-Cultural,
Data Processing,
High-Energy,
Misc,
Quotes,
Uncertainty |
Comment
Jun 4th, 2009| 04:36 pm | Posted by hlee
Please, do not confuse adaptive filter (hereafter, AF) with adaptive optics (hereafter, AO). I have no expertise in both fields but have small experiences to tell you the difference. Simply put, AF is comparable to software as opposed to AO to hardware, which is for constructing telescopes in order to collect data with sharpness and to minimize time varying atmospheric blurring. When you search adaptive filter in ADS you’ll more likely come across with adaptive optics and notch filter. …Continue reading»
Jun 2nd, 2009| 03:03 am | Posted by hlee
Even though I traced the astronomers’ casual usage of the null hypothesis probability in a fashion of reporting outputs from data analysis packages of their choice, there were still some curious cases of the null hypothesis probability that I couldn’t solve. They are quite mysterious to me. Sometimes too much creativity harms the original intention. Here are some examples. …Continue reading»
Tags:
cases,
chi-sq,
curious,
degree of freedom,
dof,
F-test,
goodness-of-fit test,
Model Selection,
null hypothesis probability,
p-value,
reduced chi-sq Category:
Astro,
Cross-Cultural,
Fitting,
Methods,
Uncertainty,
arXiv |
3 Comments
Jun 1st, 2009| 09:51 pm | Posted by hlee
How would you assign orders to multivariate data? If you have your strategy to achieve this ordering task, I’d like to ask, “is your strategy affine invariant?” meaning that shift and rotation invariant. …Continue reading»
Tags:
break points,
data depth,
MADS,
mean,
median,
multivariate,
nonparametric,
order,
parasite,
quantile,
robust,
sort,
vertebrate Category:
Algorithms,
Cross-Cultural,
Jargon,
Stat,
arXiv |
Comment
May 28th, 2009| 11:54 pm | Posted by hlee
This simple law, despite my trial of full text search, was not showing in ADS. As discussed in systematic errors, astronomers, like physicists, show their error components in two additive terms; statistical error + systematic error. To explain such decomposition and to make error analysis statistically rigorous, the law of total variance (LTV) seems indispensable. …Continue reading»
Tags:
additive,
bias,
law of total variance,
MADS,
mathematical statistics,
mean integrated square error,
mean square error,
MISE,
mse,
probability theory,
variance Category:
Algorithms,
Data Processing,
Jargon,
News,
Stat,
Uncertainty |
Comment
May 27th, 2009| 03:45 pm | Posted by TomLoredo
I’ve copied below the text of an ISBA announcement for the first workshop in a new series addressing Bayesian methods for machine learning. It builds on the model of the earlier well-known “Bayesian case studies” workshops, where just a few applications are featured at each workshop, with the format tailored to produce a lot of back-and-forth between application scientists and statisticians.
One of the three topics for the October workshop is titled “Calibrating the Universe: a Bayesian Uncertainty Analysis of a Galaxy Simulation.” This sounds a bit reminiscent of the “cosmic calibration” work by a collaboration of astronomers and statisticians at Los Alamos. They are using a combination of parametric and nonparametric Bayesian methods and dimensional reduction and experimental design techniques to infer cosmological parameters from CMB, large scale structure, and Type Ia supernova data. Despite the similarity in nomenclature, this appears to be a different team and a different application. However, from what I can glean from the team, it’s the same kind of problem: implementing a parametric Bayesian analysis with a computationally expensive model, by building a fast nonparametric “emulator” for the model. Should be interesting.
…Continue reading»
May 21st, 2009| 05:55 pm | Posted by hlee
Among billion objects in our Galaxy, outside the Earth, our Sun drags most attention from astronomers. These astronomers go by solar physicists, who enjoy the most abundant data including 400 year long sunspot counts. Their joy is not only originated from the fascinating, active, and unpredictable characteristics of the Sun but also attributed to its influence on our daily lives. Related to the latter, sometimes studying the conditions on the Sun is called space weather forecast. …Continue reading»
Tags:
classifier,
forecast,
logistic regression,
machine learning,
predictor,
response,
space weather,
Sun,
sunspot,
SVM,
test data,
training data,
weather Category:
Astro,
Cross-Cultural,
Data Processing,
Imaging,
Jargon,
Stars,
Stat,
arXiv |
Comment
May 18th, 2009| 12:18 pm | Posted by hlee
My understandings of “robustness” from the education in statistics and from communicating with astronomers are hard to find a mutual interest. Can anyone help me to build a robust bridge to get over this abyss? …Continue reading»
Tags:
break point,
Huber,
nonparametric,
robust,
Rousseeuw,
Tukey Category:
Bayesian,
Frequentist,
Jargon,
MCMC,
Methods,
Quotes,
Stat,
Uncertainty |
Comment
May 7th, 2009| 02:22 pm | Posted by hlee
Almost 100 years ago, A.S. Eddington stated in his book Stellar Movements (1914) that
…in calculating the mean error of a series of observations it is preferable to use the simple mean residual irrespective of sign rather than the mean square residual
Such eminent astronomer said already least absolute deviation over chi-square, if I match simple mean residual and mean square residual to relevant methodologies, in order. …Continue reading»
Tags:
chi-square minimization,
Eddington,
inference,
LAD,
Laplace,
mse,
PyMC,
Python,
R.A.Fisher,
utility function Category:
Astro,
Cross-Cultural,
Quotes,
Stat,
Uncertainty |
Comment
May 7th, 2009| 11:14 am | Posted by hlee
One of [ArXiv] papers from yesterday whose title might drag lots of attentions from astronomers. Furthermore, it’s a short paper.
[arxiv:math.CO:0905.0483] by Harmany, Marcia, and Willet.
…Continue reading»
Tags:
compressed sensing,
decomposition,
EM algorithm,
intensity,
MPLE,
multiscale,
penalty,
Poisson,
Poisson Intensity,
Sparcity,
wavelet Category:
Algorithms,
Astro,
Cross-Cultural,
Data Processing,
High-Energy,
Imaging,
Jargon,
arXiv |
Comment
May 4th, 2009| 12:36 pm | Posted by vlk
For someone who doesn’t know any grammar, I can be a bit of a Grammar nazi sometimes. And one of my pet peeves is when people use the word data in the singular. No! Data are!
Or so I used to believe. …Continue reading»
Apr 27th, 2009| 05:26 pm | Posted by hlee
To my knowledge, Richard Feynman is an iconic figure among physicists and astrophysicists. Although I didn’t read every chapter of his lecture series, from other books like QED, Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman!, The Pleasure of Finding Things Out, and some essays, I became and still am fond of him. The way how this famous physicist put things is straight and simple, blowing out the misconception that physics is full of mathematical equations.
Even though most of my memories about his writings are gone – how many people can beat the time and fading memories! – like other rudimentary astronomy and physics stuffs that I used to know, statistics brought up his name above the surface before it sinks completely to the abyss. …Continue reading»
Apr 22nd, 2009| 02:02 pm | Posted by hlee
I was reading Lehmann’s memoir on his friends and colleagues who influence a great deal on establishing his career. I’m happy to know that his meeting Landau, Courant, and Evans led him to be a statistician; otherwise, we, including astronomers, would have had very different textbooks and statistical thinking would have been different. On the other hand, I was surprised to know that he chose statistics over physics due to his experience from Cambridge (UK). I thought becoming a physicist is more preferred than becoming a statistician during the first half of the 20th century. At least I felt that way, probably it’s because more general science books in physics and physics related historic events were well exposed so that I became to think that physicists are more cooler than other type scientists. …Continue reading»
Tags:
book,
Durrenmatt,
E. L. Lehmann,
Heisenberg,
physicists,
statistician,
uncertainty principle Category:
Cross-Cultural,
Misc,
Physics,
Quotes,
Stat,
Uncertainty |
Comment
Apr 20th, 2009| 09:34 pm | Posted by hlee
I asked a couple of astronomers if they heard the term plug-in estimator and none of them gave me a positive answer. …Continue reading»
Tags:
biased,
breakdown point,
chi-square,
confidence interval,
coverage,
delta chi-square,
estimator,
LAD,
mean,
median,
plug-in,
rmse Category:
Bad AstroStat,
Cross-Cultural,
Data Processing,
Jargon,
Uncertainty |
2 Comments